On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Michael Elkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:41:23AM -0500, peng shao wrote:
>>
>> Hi, thank you for your attention and here is a little problem: I have
>> two mail accounts, assume they are
>>
>> [email protected]
>> [email protected]
>>
>> and especially [email protected] is on my department's RHEL server. I have set
>> up a ~/.forward file on A's server and let it to forward all emails to
>> address B, then I use mutt to manipulate all mails from B directly.
>> However if I try to send a test email to A from my gmail, then I can
>> correctly receive the mail in B by using mutt+getmail. But if I simply
>> reply that email in mutt, the receiver of the reply is not
>> [email protected], but the forwarding address [email protected], which is certainly
>> not what I want. I read the header of the forwarded mail I received at
>> B and it seems everything is fine. If I use thunderbird to reply it
>> then [email protected] is placed correctly as the receiver. Is there anyway
>> to let mutt recognize the correct receiver? Thank you.
>
> Do you happen to have "[email protected]" listed in your "alternates"?  There is
> an open bug on trac regarding this issue.  There is a difference of opinion
> on what the correct thing to do in this situation.

That is exactly the cause to  my problem. Thanks a lot for the information.
>
> me
>

Reply via email to