On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:15:09PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > Thanks for coming up with that. I will look at using your bash wrapper > although there is part of me that thinks mutt needs some hacking on > (which I may do when I have more time) as I still think the send-hook > should be able to do what I want.
One of the best explanations as to why it is the way it is: http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=127134610222635&w=2 Hopefully you can crack this egg. -- Monte
