On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Michael Graham wrote: > I’m with Stardiviner on this one: I don’t think this *is* really a fault > in mutt. I don’t think mutt was designed to handle that many emails in a > single folder
I disagree. Mutt seems to be to be designed around those who have tens or hundreds of thousands of mail that they need to work through. The key bindings make working through folders, accounts, the pagere, etc. a snap. Searching and limiting mail is painless (although better tools exist). For someone who has over 70,000 email messages in their account, Mutt is the only way to go. -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
