++ 17/09/13 19:56 +0200 - Remco Rijnders: >> Now I am willing to give it try and update the patch to reflect the >> current code-base. However, as I am not a coder and definately not C, >> such an update will most likely take me quite some time. >> >> Before I would embark on such a journey: has anyone this done >> already? :) [...] > As I had to cancel a key signing with you at The Hague HS train station > years ago, I do owe you a small favour. I have edited the patch of [1] so > it hopefully applies to the current 1.5.21 mutt release*. Note, I have not > tested it myself, you can be the guinea pig :-)
Ha, that's sounds like a deal! For what it is worth: I had already forgotten about our cancelled appointment. Still, thanks a lot for the offer. From your second e-mail I understand the proposed patch is not working, so I won't test it. However, if you have a new patch, I'm happy to be a guinea pig. > *) The original patch was also nice enough to update the documentation to > document this change, I'm too lazy for that as the documentation files seem > to have changed / moved / depend on some other patch. The format of the document has changed from one markup language to the other. If you do the code, I'll do the documentation. :P) -- Rejo Zenger . <[email protected]> . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger
pgp8RemZRBFMW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
