On 2014-01-26 13:49:34 +0000, Mick wrote: > I tried all kinds of caching to make reading imap (on a remote mail server) > acceptable and have failed to find a solution for really large mail folders > that have tens of thousands of messages. Smaller imap folders are accessed > quickly within a couple of seconds or so, but larger folders have always been > a problem here, compared say to Kmail or T'bird. I don't know if it is down > to caching architecture differences between various mail clients or not yet > having tried some configuration that works for mutt, so I would be interested > to see if you come across a solution.
The only acceptable solution I have found is caching mails offline, but this is still slow for mailboxes with >100000 messages.
pgpx1kOLtQ9s4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
