Sure I forgot the... [see below]

On 160923-15:32+0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote:

> http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147448664132307&w=2
> but for clarity I'll attach the same file here as ClausAssmann.tar

ClausAssmann.tar attached to this email.

---
A digression, don't read below if you don't have the time to.

However, I'm curious, if at all this is possible (time on an eventual
reader who would respond) to know why I got my own mail back (to be able
to send this errata) only after some 55 minutes.

Repeating: 55 minutes it took me (tried multiple times, as I realized
pretty quickly that I forgot the attachment, and tried right away to get
my own mail from mutt-users and send this attachment.

How fast was in the case of this previous email of mine the Marc.info
archive, and was it due to it being slow or was it due to my provider,
whom I have beef with, decided to molest me again
(see http://www.croatiafidelis.hr/cenz/iskon-tcom-mr/ for a little on
that)
?

I also checked the pages:
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&r=1&b=201609&w=2
and that previous email of mine really didn't show for about the same 55
minutes, which I know perfectly can be because of the same page being
kept in cache at the providers and not being renewed.

Thanks if anybody replies. (Pls. don't count for certain that I would
receive your private email, they often just don't send those if they
know I wouldn't be able to know about them and/or wouldn't be able to proof
anything.)
-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

Attachment: ClausAssmann.tar
Description: Unix tar archive

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to