On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 04:05:35PM +0200, leo wrote:
> I've read that Neomutt is not a fork "We merge all of Mutt's changes 
> into NeoMutt and get features into a state that Mutt will accept" [2].

No, it's a fork.  And no, they don't get features into a state I will
accept.

> It isn't a big problem ;) but I want Mutt and not Neomutt.

Let Debian know then.  I used to spend time looking at Debian bugs, but
don't bother anymore.  I wish they would rename their package to NeoMutt
since they've basically switched their upstream.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to