Forgot to send these messages of my thread to the list also:
Hello Francesco, On Fr 15.06.18 15:15, Francesco Ariis wrote: >Hey Martin, > sorry, after rereading your message I feel I gave a completely stupid >suggestion. > >To make it clear: say you have 5 new messages, you will read all of them >and then press tab once, right? > With 5 messages, I would hit Tab 5-6 times to jump from where ever my cursor is at the beginning to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and then a final time to sync/mark the last one as read. So I can do everything with one key :) Best regards, Martin Hello Francesco, thank you for your reply. Hm, I don't quite understand what you mean, sorry. I already have a macro just on Tab not on "o". What do you mean by a "single command"? Using Tab is convenient for me, as I can skip through my mostly short emails until all are "read" and then go back to whatever I have been doing before. Best regards, Martin On Mi 13.06.18 22:15, Francesco Ariis wrote: >Hello Martin, > >On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:14:51PM +0200, Martin wrote: >> Any idea how to solve it better? I guess if I could configure mutt to >> mark a message as read right when I open it, it >> would solve it. Yes, this is a very lazy first world problem. :( > >Can't you make, say, 'o' (open message) a macro instead of a binding it >to a single command? >
