On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 07:44:38 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
Mihai Lazarescu <[email protected]> wrote on Sun, 23 Sep 2018
at 11:50:01 +0200 in <[email protected]>:
> If non-mutt solutions are acceptable, I'd change [email protected] to
> [email protected] in some procmail rule(s).
(In a world where we have DKIM, it seems an especially bad
idea, although I don't know if DKIM tends to include the To:
header in its crypto hashes).
DKIM appears to not include such headers (but no personal
experience here): «DKIM attaches a new domain name identifier
to a message and uses cryptographic techniques to validate
authorization for its presence. The identifier is independent
of any other identifier in the message, such in the author's
From: field.» http://www.dkim.org/
Mutt-wise, would it be doable to set user-defined variables to
specific patterns (e.g., my_f1=~p!~f…) and expand them to
limit the view (i.e., use variables as shortcuts for complex
match patterns)? This is a question since I am not so
mutt-proficient as I'd wish to be… :-)
Mihai
