In days of yore (Sat, 13 Apr 2024), Laura Orvokki Kursula via Mutt-users thus quoth: > Hello all > > I have encountered a strange problem setting up mutt: when I attach a > signature > block to my e-mail using `$signature', my PGP signature is, according to mutt, > invalid. E-mails without signature blocks yield valid PGP signatures. If I go > back and replace the automatic signature with something else, the PGP > signature > checks out too. Is this a known issue? Is there something I can do about it?
That is odd. I do not see that at all (just tested, mutt-2.2.13 on Debian). For a gpg signature to be invalid, what is signed has to have changed in some way. You are doing effectively this in muttrc: set signature="~/.mutt/signature" yes? And there is nothing in the signature that could be altered after it is pulled into the message and the GnuPG signature is applied, right? My questions would be: - mutt gnupg configuration, is it changed in any way from distribution default? - version of mutt and what distribution/version are you running? My suggestion would be to run mutt with -d1 or -d2 and look at the debug output (crank the debug level higher if need be, it goes up to five) to work out what happens. -- Kind regards, /S
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
