On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 07:16:53PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:04:19PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra via Mutt-users wrote: > > > PS: Off-topic to this thread, but I have realized that the mutt mailing > > list does not have Reply-To set to the mailing list. > > That's been a worldwide subject of argument for 20 or 30 years. Some people > think mailing lists should do that, some think they should not. > > Mutt has a function <list-reply>, by default bound to 'L', that replies to a > mailing list. See the manual.
Agree... and of all the lists where it shouldn't matter as much, this is probably high on the list, exactly because most of its members shouldn't need to. This is also why Mutt has a built in feature to _ignore_ Reply-To when it matches the list address. To the OP: you can see some earlier threads about this, like https://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/Week-of-Mon-20241202/thread.html#4640 https://mutt-users.mutt.narkive.com/aYn852dy/how-to-reply-to-mailing-list-address-by-default Some disagree strongly, but this is probably the "classic" post about the subject: https://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html /w
