On 28May2025 08:49, Sébastien Hinderer <sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a
> message will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc to
> that list, even if you are subscribed to this list.
Yes, I think that's right.
Out of curiosity, what kind of list does that, and why?
To the first part of your question I would have thought that the
response does not depend from the list but that the problem happens
everytime someboy Bccs a list?
Well, such a message would lack the To:the-list header. But I'd expect
the List-ID: et al to be present, having passed through the list
software.
But if eg it went to you personally (directly) and also via a list, you
will get 2 copies: one with list headers via the list and one without
(the direct copy to you). You'd need to examine the not-recognised
message headers to see which, and why.
This discussion is a little moot without seeing example message headers
- the possible behaviour is quite varied.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>
