Dear Jean Louis, Many thanks for your response!
Actually, after I wrote the quesiton i managed to convince myself that it was meaningless because the question coudl actually make sens only for clients that were running inside of Emacs. With your response I realise that the situation may not be that desperate for Mutt users that I thought and I find this a wonderful news. Tow observations I would like to share: 1. With your solution the links contain the name of the folder where the message is stored. It's not that bad but I am still wondering whether one couldn't use only the message id, which wold mean that the solution would work even if the message is moved to a different folder. Of course that would require a kind of indexing to go frommessage ids to folders but does that look completely undoable? 2. If I understand you correctly, the part that has to be different when done fromMutt as compared to when done from Emacs is the store link stage, which is, if I understand you correctly, where your macro comes in. But I think if oneis using Emacs in server mode then it should be possible to call Org's store-link feature by running emacsclient, which would make the link available to all the other running instances of emacsclient. 3. A sllightly different topic is if one uses Org as a bookmark manager and wnat to store into in links that are in message bodies, rather than links tomessages themselves. But I assume the smae trick of invoking org-store-link through emacsclient could work. HAs somebody already set this up? Thanks, Seb.
