On 11/1/06, Steve Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that mythtv scheduling is up and running, I'm thinking of dusting off my > ideas for more native GBPVR support.
I'm totally confused about what you are proposing. The performance issues on the GBPVR server aren't really related to the mvpmc other then a bit of rfb overhead and if mvpmc can keep up I think a low end host machine should also be able to handle it. There is a bit of overhead on the media streaming protocol but don't see this loading the host system either . GBPVR streaming live tv with mpeg2 from my PVR 150 has about a 3% system load (amd 2600), and the mvpmc emulation mode load is 40%. I actually get better streaming performance via emulation mode then I do from a Windows share on the same box. (possible because of virus scanning). > What I'm thinking of doing is a bit kludgy. Basically I propose running a > small "Conversion Server" that talks to MVPMC using myth protocol, and then > interfaces more directly with GBPVR. This is where I get the most confused, since it sounds like you still want to run gbpvr to manage/create/update the database and create the mpegs, but you want mvpmc to connect to the remote SQLite database and access it directly. To me this put more strain on the host and not less. I've got other concerns but I'll wait until I better understand your proposal. Also this is probably better suited for the dev. mailing list. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
