I think that the expansion of the DPL tag (parser function and parser tag, both are possible!) should be handled by the php code of the DPL extension.
DPL has quite a lot of features and it would be very hard work to re- implement all or even part of its functionality in another language. Also, wIthin DPL some MW parser functions are called to process transcluded content. So I think Jeremy is absolutely right: The collection extension should process a page after DPL has done its job. If the mwlib can live with that sequence of processing it should be possible to enable DPL with reasonable effort. Otherwíse I see no chance. DPL's output is in principle standard WIKI syntax; in some cases (~ 10%) HTML tags will be found in the output. These text portions are wrapped within HTML .. /HTML tags, however, so they are also wiki-compatible. Gero On 17 Nov., 19:11, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > Does it really make sense to parse the dpl tag? I would think since > dpl is designed mostly to dynamic create a wiki page by transclusion > that it should be left to be parsed by the mediawiki parser then the > output could be handled just as any other wiki text is handled. is > that facility available? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mwlib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mwlib?hl=.
