On 10/08/10 14:40, John Beranek wrote:
> On 10/08/10 12:25, JohnB wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 5:31 pm, Richard Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Mon, 9 August, 2010 14:07:14
>>>> Subject: Re: [mwlib] ImportError: No module named render
>>>
>>>> On 09/08/10 10:58, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>>>>> It probably doesn't matter. That version of mwlib won't work with python
>>>>> 2.4.
>>>
>>>> Oh, and is there any advice/instructions on installing mwlib.rl on
>>>> Python 2.4? ("Don't" doesn't count, ;)).
>>>
>>> Search in the archives for the message which explained that the next 
>>> release of
>>> mwlib wouldn't support python 2.4, and use the previous version? There will 
>>> of
>>> course be bugs, but the same is true of python 2.4
>>>
>>> You could always install a more current version of python alongside 2.4 on
>>> Centos if you insist upon a prehistoric OS but don't mind some of the real 
>>> world
>>> creeping into your time warp.
>>
>> OK, I've tried this latter suggestion, and hit a different problem.
>> mwlib thinks I've not got PIL, but in fact I do:
> 
> An addendum:

OK, this is very odd. I downloaded Imaging-1.1.7.tar.gz from
http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/ and installed it, and it now works!

My previous attempt installed PIL using easy_install2.7.

John.

-- 
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to