Translate the score onto the same scale that Importance and Urgency are already, so that you can get a list of your tasks, grouped by their calculated priority.
Minor tweak, majorly useful. The inability to do this really degrades the usefulness of the computed score. However great the algorithm is, I need hard lines. A never-ending list is mind-numbing. Discrete categories are helpful to immediately see: what should I care about right now? While I'm probably more in the GTD camp, I find that the Steven Covey 3-tier prioritization (ABC; Vital/Important/Urgent) is one of the most useful techniques to help me use my time appropriately. What is near- emergency and really MUST be done ASAP, what should I keep in mind in order to try to squeeze in when I can, and what do I want to have on the list because if would be nice to do if I had the time. As is, I can use contexts, which just somehow feels unsatisfactory... Or I can group by either Urgency or Importance. Which one? I can never decide. It doesn't matter of course, but I'm annoyed by the presence of the one I'm trying to ignore. And then I have to categorize each task on it's own, defeating the entire purpose of the computed score, which I end up just not using. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/myLifeOrganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
