Hmm - I thought I'd try the weekly goal trick, and see it's gone
missing on my beta version. Oh well . . .

I've actually been doing Ctrl-M and Enter to move a partially done
item to the end of the last page (of course the first time you need to
set the default position to move to). But if you want to keep a record
of such tasks in situ then I guess a duplication first.

The new system is so simple that almost any software can handle it.
I've been very tempted to use pen and paper. Also tried Google
Spreadsheet (where the number of rows in a tabbed sheet can be
restricted), I think Excel might be good too, and portable. I like the
speed of Ctrl-M Enter, but on the Pocket PC the process is much
slower. Also it would be nice to have a count after the outline text
showing x items unchecked out of y - e.g. "Page [9/25]. And
highlighting I have yet to do, but MLO desktop can't yet do that,
while the Pocket PC can with a little persuasion.

But as you rightly say, simplicity is key, and at the moment I suspect
the technology is slower than using a pen (though better for backing
up!).

L

On 9 Jan, 14:56, "Steve Wynn" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree, do it in the Outline it keeps things really simple and with this 
> method I think simplicity is key.
>
> I am no expert on Autofocus - but I think the idea is not to move an item to 
> the end of the list but to complete the item and re-enter it at the end of 
> the list if more work is still required.
>
> There are multiple ways to do this and now within the ToDo list view you can 
> now just add another item to your last page. You could utilise CTRL+D to 
> duplicate the item and then drag/drop to the last page. Or alternatively it 
> could be achieved quite easily by using RTE.  If you point RTE to the last 
> page within the Outline any tasks entered from RTE will go to the bottom of 
> the list as such.  
>
> Personally I think there is something to be said for manually typing the 
> action in again - a little along the lines that writing something down on a 
> frequent basis instills it into memory. I think even with typing as such, 
> there is a similar principle involved.
>
> As a place marker at the moment within my pages I utilise a weekly goal.  One 
> reason being I like the green tick for completion - I think it looks nifty.
>
> All the best
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original message ----------------------------------------
> From: LondonTrader <[email protected]>
> To: MyLifeOrganized <[email protected]>
>
> Received: 09/01/2009 07:48:58
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Ordering Tasks and "Use Time" (Feature Request?)
>
> >I'm doing it in the outline.
>
> >+Page
> >+Page
>
> >-Page
> >  Task1
>
> >  Task2
> >  Task3
> >+Page
> >+Page
> >+Page
>
> >The >>> entry is a place marker. It reminds me I am
> >working on Task 2
> >on the third page. When I feel I have done enough, I
> >drag the task on
> >to the lowest page.
>
> >L
>
> >On 8 Jan, 18:51, Wreckless <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >> I am trying to adapt MLO to a promising new time
> >management method
> >> called Autofocus by Mark Foster.
>
> >> It requires ordering tasks in a list and being able to
> >move tasks to
> >> the bottom of the list.
>
> >> I'm trying to fake this functionality by ordering by
> >Due Date and when
> >> I need to move a task to the bottom, I uncheck and
> >recheck "Set Due
> >> Date" and then check "Use Time".
>
> >> The problem with this is that it sets the time 10
> >minutes into the
> >> future and the task is not visible for 10 minutes.
>
> >> Is there any other way to quickly put a task on the
> >bottom of a list?
> >> Or, could the "Use Time" feature at least be made to
> >default to the
> >> current time?
>
> >> Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/myLifeOrganized?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to