Changed behavior according to 2. Fixed issue when StartDate set to 1899 in Outlook if it is not set in MLO.
A. On Jan 16, 12:20 am, "Andrey Tkachuk (MLO)" <[email protected]> wrote: > David, > > Outlook does not support start date without due date. > > So we have only two options: > 1) Remove start date when sync to Outlook > 2) Set due date = start date in Outlook for tasks which do not have > due date in MLO > > I like option 2. > > I have just tested and for me MLO works according to 1) i.e. it > removes start date in Outlook but still syncs the tasks. > > Please let me know if you are using specific to-do view to sync to > Outlook which might be the reason why tasks do not sync. > > Andrey. > > On Jan 15, 4:02 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I love the ability now to have tasks with only a start date - but > > these tasks will not sync to Outlook (which I also do). > > > At least there should be a warning that pops up saying "This task will > > not sync to Outlook because it has a start date without a due date - > > set due date to start date? <YES> <NO>" > > > Just silently skipping them seems kind of harsh. > > > But preferably an Outlook sync configuration option that would say > > something like: > > <> Warn me when attempting to sync tasks with start dates but no due > > dates > > <> Automatically set due date to start date for tasks with only > > start dates > > > Thanks for considering! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/myLifeOrganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
