Interesting idea. Another idea could be to set the due date to +1 Year from the start date...
A. On Jan 29, 3:46 pm, Justin Vallon <[email protected]> wrote: > What about setting the due date far in the future for tasks with start but no > due date? A constant date (31-Dec-2999, etc) is probably best. > > -Justin > > -----Original Message----- > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: "MyLifeOrganized" <[email protected]> > Sent: 1/15/09 8:02 AM > Subject: [MLO] Outlook sync for tasks with only a start date > > I love the ability now to have tasks with only a start date - but > these tasks will not sync to Outlook (which I also do). > > At least there should be a warning that pops up saying "This task will > not sync to Outlook because it has a start date without a due date - > set due date to start date? <YES> <NO>" > > Just silently skipping them seems kind of harsh. > > But preferably an Outlook sync configuration option that would say > something like: > <> Warn me when attempting to sync tasks with start dates but no due > dates > <> Automatically set due date to start date for tasks with only > start dates > > Thanks for considering! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/myLifeOrganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
