Are you using the Beta version of Bonsai for Win Mobile?  I went from Palm
to Win Mobile some time ago and I don't know of a Palm device out there that
I could go back to.

tb

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 AM, reesd <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I switched from MLO to Bonsai over a year ago because I needed outline
> filtering. I wrote several detailed posts about how it could work, but
> it just never happened. I check back every once in a while to see if
> its finally been put back in, but am sadly disappointed each time.
> Personally I can't function without outline filtering so I'll be
> sticking with Bonsai for now (though I am eyeing InfoCube also -
> http://www.infoqube.biz/).
>
> d
>
> On Sep 6, 4:36 am, cd <[email protected]> wrote:
> > and another vote for thatfilter- i switched from achieve planner to
> > MLO
> > due to superior MLO PPC functionality but miss the outlinefilter
> > which is fantastic
> >
> > On Sep 4, 10:02 pm, Top Cat <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for filtering in outline
> >
> > > On Sep 1, 12:38 pm, daneb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Hello,
> >
> > > > There are several issues, which I have expected to improve in MLO for
> > > > long, long time. It is 1) prioritization of tasks (not importance/
> > > > urgency, but real ABC or similar prioritization method, over which
> has
> > > > user full control) and even more important 2) filtering in tree view
> > > > (based on this prioritization and other criteria)
> >
> > > > What was always my problem with MLO – when my tree became too
> > > > complicated (included all work and home areas, someday/maybe, area,
> > > > long-term goals, deferred tasks etc) and had several hundreds of
> > > > items, it was absolutely impossible to focus on tasks, which were
> > > > important at the moment (e.g. week goals, A-priority…). Of course, I
> > > > couldfilterand view them in to-do view, but in case I would be
> > > > satisfied with not hierarchical to-do view, I would stay with
> Outlook.
> > > > I just want to view only relevant tasks at the moment in my tree
> view,
> > > > like Achieve Planner enables me to.
> >
> > > > I do not understand why so important feature has not been implemented
> > > > yet, especially when basic filtering in outline is in fact available,
> > > > although in very elemental way (you canfilterout completed tasks
> > > > from the tree view).
> >
> > > > I would like to ask other users or Andrey if they would consider this
> > > > filtering important or what you do when the task lists become several
> > > > hundreds items long and start to be too cluttered. I know, there are
> > > > many ways how to get around this problem – to use several MLO files,
> > > > to-do views, A,B,C folders as priorities. But why to compromise when
> > > > other applications (even Outlook) can solve this issue very easily?
> >
> > > > MLO is best GTD application available in my opinion. But I am afraid
> > > > that it only remains best application for GTD and will have very
> > > > limited possibility for using for more strategic (vertical, 30000
> feet
> > > > or how to name it) goal and time management, which is impossible to
> > > > implement in well-arranged way without implementation of priorities
> > > > and filtering in tree view (and ad lib sorting of tasks in to-do
> view,
> > > > but it is another problem). Because GTD is ingenious but there are
> > > > also limits of this approach (especially with vertical TM), which
> > > > could be avoid by combination with other methods (e.g. Covey) which
> > > > require above mentioned features.
> >
> > > > Thank you for your opinions, replies or suggestions!
> >
> > > > Daneb
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to