Thanks for the response Andrey but I don't really understand. What is the purpose of this intended behaviour?
By the way, when we move out of Beta on 3.5.0 and you update the User's Guide documentation would it be possible to put a bit more detail into the section on Advanced Filtering? It's very thin at the moment. I'm sure more people would use this functionality if they understood the options a bit better - not everybody is into Boolean operators and queries ;-) Thanks again, Ken On Feb 2, 9:51 am, "Andrey Tkachuk (MLO)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes it is intended behavior. When you create subrule the current > record actually converted to brackets "()" and the formula of the item > you converted is ignored. > So if you want to keep created rules and move them to brackets just do > the following > 1) create new empty rule > 2) move your current rules as subrule of the created rule > > A. > > On Jan 28, 10:19 pm, Lisa Stroyan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think this might have been in previous version too; not sure. > > > I have a view with 2 rules. The first one is Flag <> (none). I want > > to add a subrule, so that I say, Flag <> none OR ToplevelParent > > contains Inbox. I click on "Add subrule", and I have to reenter Flag > > <> none because it is changed to "Empty". > > > If this is the intended behavior, it's not very intuitive. I would > > like it to keep Flag <> none, and put me in a *new* empty rule. > > > Lisa > > > ---------- > > Lisa Stroyan, mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
