Just to throw my tuppence ha'penny worth into this discussion. I really don't think we should get distracted with the issue of a small group of users paying for their own preferred developments. I mean, come on, it's just not going to happen is it? !! Product development just isn't driven by this sort of dynamic. Surely it relies on the judgement of the developer about which enhancements would be the the most beneficial for ALL users, remaining true to the principle purpose for which it is intended. And I guess development time is focused on those enhancements which potentially have the greatest effect in enhancing revenue - because this is a business after all.
A great thing about MLO is that it has a really active user forum where people thrash around ideas and this provides Andrey with good feedback. And as you say pottster " a Developer who actually uses the product themself, has got good intuition about what works and what doesn't". But I do think that relative dates is AN EXCELLENT IDEA - something I've brought up in the past. In my opinion, it would fit perfectly within the MLO logic and intended use, and it would add a tremendous amount of value. Hopefully, Andrey (and his evil twin sister business advisor "Audrey") would agree.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
