Please help make this clear to Andrey - go to:
http://mlo.uservoice.com/forums/9235-general and vote for the suggestion
that is already there. Add your own suggestions. If enough people start to
use the site it will give Andrey a better idea where to put his time and
effort.

Cheers
Mark

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Richard Collings <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I would agree that MLO is good for helping decide what you should work on
> next and making sure you don’t forget stuff but in my world at least people
> say to me ‘Can you do this Friday?’ and I need some way to work this out
> given all my other commitments (and it is something that I am truly dreadful
> at – so I end up working into the night very often).
>
>
>
> Something like MS Project is way over the top – I just need a tool which
> helps me visualise my upcoming work with some indication of what I have to
> get done each day over the next week or two and some indication of the scale
> of work involved on each day.    As I have all this information in MLO
> already it would be brilliant if Andrey could find a way of presenting this
> sort of view
>
>
>
> I have been using the Pomodoro technique to some degree (where you measure
> time in 30 minute blocks) and I think there is some considerable mileage in
> developing this further.
>
>
>
> In terms of large scale new developments, this would get my vote very time.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Neal
> *Sent:* 07 September 2010 4:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [MLO] Re: MLO without a Calendar
>
>
>
> I'm a big fan of this concept.  I use flags to define groups of work.
> Every task fits into one of these groups.
>
> Projects
> People
> Paperwork
> Physical work
> Personal stuff
>
> My calendar simply defines which flag I am working on.  I then filter flags
> in MLO views and let my MLO order decide which task to work on.
>
> I found this works out better for me then trying to pre-plan which task I
> am going to schedule at what time.  At this point I no longer want a
> calendar for pre-planning.
>
> It still would be useful to have a calendar for time tracking though.
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that seems like a decent solution.
>
> One more thing though, when do I process to-do tasks that aren't in my
> alloted times?
>
> For example, "Call XYZ regarding blah blah". Tasks like these could
> pop up un-announced.
> Do I just interrpt whatever I was doing to perform these kind of tasks
> or what?
>
> On Sep 7, 1:38 am, Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey, Mike--
> >
> > I am in the same boat that you are in, but I found a bit of stop-gap
> > solution which is:
> >
> > 1) Using Google Calendar, allocate time to various projects (in my
> > case, contexts/allocation buckets) each week.
> > 2) In MLO, add another context to each task for the project.
> > 3) When the event comes up on the calendar, switch to MLO and filter
> > the To-Do view for the given time allocation.
> >
> > It is not perfect, but it does solve the problem and is available
> > today. As long as you are disciplined about respecting your allocated
> > time, it will work and deliver results.
> >
> > On Sep 5, 9:02 am, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > MLO seems like probably the best task management software around, but
> > > it's missing a critical component - the calendar.
> >
> > > I currently have a few projects I want to start and each of them have
> > > various goals and "checkpoints".
> > > I'd like to allot a particular amount of time to each project
> > > throughout the week in such a way that I won't really have to manually
> > > plan what to do in each session - it should be taken care of by the
> > > project's massive to-do list so I could just pick off where I have
> > > left off earlier.
> >
> > > Without a built-in Calendar, MLO can only be used with software such
> > > as Outlook, which may be utterly useless to some of us (I'm a student
> > > - I don't need the burden of Outlook because I use Gmail for my
> > > emailing needs).
> >
> > > Is a Calendar feature being planned for a future revision?
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<mylifeorganized%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<mylifeorganized%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<mylifeorganized%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>
   *Mark Levison* | Agile Pain Relief
Consulting<http://agilepainrelief.com/>| Agile
Editor @ InfoQ <http://www.infoq.com/about.jsp>
Blog <http://www.notesfromatooluser.com/> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/mlevison>| Office: (613) 862-2538
Recent Entries: Self Inflicted Agile
Injuries<http://www.notesfromatooluser.com/2009/12/self-inflicted-agile-injuries.html>,
Why use an Agile
Coach<http://www.notesfromatooluser.com/2009/11/why-use-an-agile-coach.html>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to