I'd tend to agree that tasks that are blockers (ie dependent tasks rest on them) should take on higher scores. Not sure how this should be done though. I would think that, irrespective of the importance of the individual tasks that are dependent on the blocker, the more tasks that are dependent on it, the higher should be the scoring for that task.
You can, of course, get around it to some extent by using the formatting rules (eg put an icon next to it indicating how many tasks are dependent on it). Generally though, I'd favour more customisation to the scoring system so that people could create their own scoring systems that work for them (perhaps with an option also to use the existing computed scoring system instead). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
