Hi Lisa:

You're describing a situation that is somewhat like mine.

Here's what I do to maximize MLO for sorting through tasks that are urgent,
while staying focused on big picture projects. This is not perfect, but I
am comfortable with it.

   1. Sort clients into their own top level category in Outline.
   2. Create the following Contexts:

   Today
   Focus
   Waiting For
   AllSet

   3. Each day, I go through my most important projects and toss the most
   important tasks into the Today Context.

   4. Go go to the To-Do tab where I have a Context View that contains,
   TODAY, FOCUS, WAITING FOR ALLSET.

   5. I manually sort all my Today tasks and then start working through
   them, each time double clicking which takes me back to the bigger picture
   project the task is a member of.

   6. For tasks that I work through, until they have to be handed off  to
   someone else (for approval, for their part etc) I change the contact from
   Today, to Waiting For. I wait until the other person has completed their
   piece of it and then put it back into Today.

   7. If I complete my entire responsibility for a task, I change the
   context to AllSet. The reason I do that instead of check it off as complete
   is the 9 times out of 10, the task is part of  a much large project that is
   not yet completed.

   8. You might ask, what is FOCUS for? I use that when there are so many
   to-do items that I have to drill down and focus only what is most urgent.
   In those cases, I assign the context Focus and then I go to that context.

I really don't know if I'm missing some functionality of MLO that would
make all of this easier. But example, I used to use the project setting,
but I sort of drift away from that because it was too restrictive for "spur
of the moment" changes of plan.

I hope this helps.
Eddie



On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Lisa Stroyan <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was reading a newsletter from David Allen of GTD about how it doesn't
> make sense to use ABC priorities, because they are always changing, and he
> suggested using Context (where you are) and energy levels instead (look
> through the task list and see what you are up for). It reminded me that my
> current use of Contexts is "broken" -- not working for me, and I thought
> I'd see if anyone else has creative ideas of how to revamp either Contexts
> or something else in my MLO setup to be more effective in a world in which
> computers are always available.
>
> Currently I use Goal to narrow down tasks to how soon I want to make sure
> I look at them, but as it always happens with my system, Week has been
> collecting more and more tasks and everything else has been being ignored.
> (Is there a word for this?  When your tasks slip and get further into the
> background noise of life?). I use Starred to choose what I should focus on
> Today (ideally, "Starring" those tasks each morning, in reality I have way
> more Starred than I ever get done).
>
> Yes, I know better Contexts won't solve all this, but I think it could
> help a little. The problem is, I'm almost always at my computer, in my
> house, with a phone right next to me, so @Computer, @Phone, @Home, don't
> help. Even my "HomeOutside" tasks are never picked because I happen to be
> outside -- they are chosen because I need to get outside and can do them
> while I'm there. @Errands and @Agendas are the only context that sort of
> works, though even with @Errands, since I haven't been disciplined enough
> to break down my tasks in advance, they often require prep work to do. (I
> do have an @ErrandPrep context that works well if I use it).
>
> Oh, another context that works for me sometimes is "@Quick" - because
> sometimes in the morning I can go through them all at once (most are
> repeating tasks that I do daily).  I do use @Routine to have separate lists
> to look at non-routine and routine tasks (drink water, make dinner, etc).
>
> I guess what I'm looking for is a way to group tasks for either a better
> way to choose "what to do next" or some way that helps get efficiency.
> Maybe I'll try something based on how much energy tasks take so I can get
> back into the idea of doing "high energy tasks" at "high energy times".
>
> Thanks for any thoughts you have!
>
> --
> Lisa
>
> ------------------------------
> Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to