I'd love to respond but the sign says "Don't Feed The Trolls". Sorry about 
that.

On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 13:27:34 UTC+1, daniel sekera wrote:
>
> (a point which is lost on a lot people here)?
>
> well then please explain since you are obviously so much more advanced. oh 
> wait by asking that probably means it is lost on me as well........
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:36 PM, pottster <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Andrey's roadmap for 4.0 is here 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mylifeorganized/HtsjfdVatbs/discussion. 
>> This was published September last year so not really any "rushing" going on 
>> which is sort of the point of the thread. The fact that you are one of many 
>> who viewed the thread just shows the level of interest in the next version 
>> of MLO desktop. It's not really about being patient or impatient (a point 
>> which is lost on a lot people here) it's about the courtesy to users of 
>> raising expectation and then not providing even a very brief update on 
>> progress which, I suspect, would keep almost everybody happy. It's a *five 
>> minute* job to do that. Not doing so is hard to understand and risks 
>> alienating (some) of the loyal user base. Strange decision by Andrey which 
>> ever way you look at it.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 22:20:42 UTC+1, David R. wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm having a little bit of trouble with this thread.
>>>
>>> First of all, I only looked in the thread because it mentioned a version 
>>> 4.0 and I hadn't heard anything about that.  I thought I was going to see a 
>>> thread created by Andrey and I certainly didn't think that my "view" would 
>>> be counted as yet another user impatient for a new version.
>>>
>>> Granted, I don't have the time to read details of every message here, 
>>> but I scanned pretty closely and I didn't see a single message asking for a 
>>> specific feature.  Is everybody here asking for a new version just to have 
>>> a new version number?
>>>
>>> I'm probably overly defensive because I have spent many years toiling in 
>>> a small development shop and I know of the demands, so I'm sorry if I'm 
>>> offending anybody.  I will plead, though, that nobody try to rush a new 
>>> release just for the sake of having one.  When a developer rushes, the 
>>> little tiny bugs that kill companies lay their eggs and start to hatch.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/N7oySZJS8YAJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/ATUunovzl2QJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to