> Will look at link in the next few hours/days...and reply back with all > questions answered to the best of my ability. thank you for replying this > also looks to be great discussion. > Thank you both, LS & JD. John
> On Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:43:59 AM UTC-7, Jonathan Davis wrote: > Look at Scrivner for writing. Its its the best on OSX and has a Windows > version too I believe. > > http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php > > JD > > > On 9 Aug 2012, at 06:54, Lisa Stroyan <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > It's not clear to me what you are looking for. You say it's perfect, but > then you say it can't cover writing tasks. If you are talking about > organizing the written material, no, I would say that is not a good fit for > MLO. > > For organizing my writing itself, I really like yWriter ( > http://www.spacejock.com/yWriter5.html ). It has limited support for > building the book though, if I recall. It may have been added; I've not > looked in a while. Some people use Evernote, but I love the "object > oriented" nature of yWriter. Each scene can have attached notes, > characters, description, and various other attributes (I believe it's > similar to Scrivener on Mac but free). It has various basic reports. > > If you are talking about organizing the tasks related to writing, I'd be > interested to hear what MLO features you find missing. I really could use > to think about my writing process more as I haven't actually been doing it. > > MLO is powerful enough that a lot of things can be done with the existing > features, but as a writer I'd be happy to help lobby for features that > could extend it in this direction, and the features don't have to be > specific to writing. > > Lisa > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:08 AM, John Hayes <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> As a writer, MLO is perfect. And sadly, I can see the MLO features are >> not covering writing tasks, building a book, and so on, so I don't want to >> waste my 10 votes or other users on something which not up for discussion. >> Had I the money to buy the company or at least a division to develop MLO >> for writers, not only would it be a money-maker, it would make writing >> organization and time saved a whole lot easier. Oh well, such is life, any >> ideas I am open to work-arounds, as long it isn't longer to do than the >> tasks itself. >> >> Thanks for reading. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MyLifeOrganized" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/nHmBWLfJmU4J. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Lisa > > ------------------------------ > Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <javascript:> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/HtTPacJmLVsJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
