Oh yes, I hope you didn't thought that I was "ill mannered" (btw thanks for 
this new english term I didn't know).
Perhaps didn't he was thinking about my ill manner, but the way you asked 
my first name, while I was using my pseudo ? Indeed, I'd rather use my real 
name like you do, but its too late if I want to keep my "anteriority" on 
this forum, isn't it ?

Anyway, I can explain a little how I do my review, and how I'd like to do 
it better :
- I have a "today" view (starred, importance>150, active, due on or before 
today or daily and due today)
- I have a "week view" (due next or last 7 days but not today, or weekly 
without due date)
- I have a "all incomplete" view
- I have a "100% completed" view (taks I can archive or delete = complete 
task whose project is complete, or project without incomplete subtasks)

My review consist in have a look at each view, then, look for the 5th one, 
which is : all tasks (= everything).

And I'd rather have a a view with only "all tasks" that doesn't belong to 
the day, week, incomplete or 100% complete view.
This new reviw feature would certainly help this, but at the price of a lot 
of clicks each time we do the review, not ? manually open the properties 
pane, click on the button "mark reviewed" each time we previously used to 
only peek (glance?) a task, annoys me.

Thanks for all.
Olivier






Le vendredi 28 décembre 2012 05:40:37 UTC+1, Dwight Arthur a écrit :
>
> Gosh, thanks Michael (_blushes_) but you must have my friend Olivier (who 
> calls himself Robisme) confused with someone else. I don't recall Olivier 
> ever making a post that was ill mannered. 
> -Dwight
>
> bossmj <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>> Dwight - sorry couldn't let this go unacknowledged.  I've been tracking 
>> your exchange with Olivier.  Been around the world (all continents) and, I 
>> am GOBSMACKED by your civility and professionalism.  One needn't look much 
>> further than one's radio, Cable TV, Internet Home page, direct reports, 
>> colleagues  {name it any human interaction in this day and age to 'run up' 
>> against bad manners.  Thank you for a brilliant example of how we ought to 
>> treat each other {no good deed goes unpunished - in case you wanted to 
>> remain low key :) } THANK YOU EVER SO MUCH FOR DIPLOMACY AND CLASS 101!  
>>
>> "Bestessstessssst regards!" *{Clearly i have work to do on my own class 
>> and grammar :)}*
>> On Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:04:07 PM UTC-5, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Olivier!
>>>
>>> What you “have to do” is determined by what filter you use for your 
>>> “review” report. Do you want to review individual tasks or folders? Do you 
>>> want to review only items that have a review schedule defined, or do you 
>>> also want to review items without a review schedule that have been 
>>> unchanged for a long period of time? There is a default “review” view that 
>>> comes with the program but I believe it’s preliminary. If you know how you 
>>> want to do your reviews you can make a view that shows the items you need 
>>> to review. If you do, please share it with the rest of us.
>>>
>>> -Dwight
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>> *On Behalf Of *robisme
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2012 9:16 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* [MLO] Re: Review every
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I'm not sure to like this new feature.
>>>
>>> I mean, do we have to click the "mark as reviewed" for each task to 
>>> review ?
>>>
>>> For some task or subtsasks, the review consists in just over-reading it 
>>> and consider eveything is ok. Do we have to mark them manually as reviewed??
>>>
>>> And there is not even a shortcut to do this.
>>>
>>> Ouch.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mardi 25 décembre 2012 12:05:58 UTC+1, Yegor Yegorov a écrit :
>>>
>>> Somebody can to explain me what is 'review every' option in task 
>>> properties (review tab)? What does it do?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/SQ1LsXV4M_AJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>>>
>> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/m67afI4QMS0J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to