I would be concerned with the idea of automating changes based on project status. The concept of "Active action" is already complicated enough for new users. I'm not saying I am completely opposed, but it needs to be very well thought out to make it usable.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Dwight Arthur <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Mok. There are two frequently requested features related to project > status. The first is for an additional value for the status field, and you > suggestion shows an excellent way to meet that request. The second it for > some workflow automation between the Project Status field and the task > status, for example, that all tasks in a Not Started project would be > inactive tasks. Would your solution to the first request make it more > difficult to implement the second? Would we have to chose which request we > liked better and abandon the other? > -Dwight > > On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:17:56 AM UTC-5, MOK | MATSURU wrote: >> >> ... My wish is to have the ability to alter and add in additional >> entries to the [Project Status] field, which is similar to the "Context" >> field where we >> can enter/delete the entries freely. ... >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/DHnP2mOq_1MJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. > -- Lisa ------------------------------ Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
