Thank you, Robert, for separating this into "what is missing from the tablet version" and "what is missing from mobile". I agree to some extent. I do think it is a trade-off, though...most people are willing to pay $10 for an Android app but probably not a whole lot more, or if so, it would be a much smaller market. I told a friend that I was beginning work on an MLO book and needed to try it on an iPad sometime. She was going to buy it, but then realized it was $20. That's worth it for a power user, but a lot for a casual user. I'm not a marketing person, but I imagine this is a tricky one.
I suppose I could see an argument for making the tablet version more powerful and more expensive. But in that case wouldn't it be better to have the desktop distinction of "standard" and "Pro"? (And it is kind of too late since Android already has "Pro".) However, I fully agree that flags are critical to port to mobile platforms in the next go-round. (Star is available now, and Active Starred view syncs its order now. Also have you seen my Android-adapted use model? http://stroyan.net/lisasblog/2012/mylifeorganized/ -- it explains how I got away from Flags using Goals). On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:07 AM, robert roszak <[email protected]>wrote: > In my opinion, I don't need separete Android phone and tablet versions. > Two separete versions would probably develop much slower than only one for > 2 platforms. > But there's an important point in original post - the usage of PCs has > been constantly giving way to the usage of mobile devices. I think this > process will be increasing. Nowadays, I've started to use android tv stick > which is called mini-pc. What it does is allowing you using android in the > way you use PC - with mouse and keyboard. > So in short, the developement of devices we use to perform day-to-day work > has been increasing fast, and I think MLO has been adopting too slowly. I > really hope there will be boost in Android app developement soon. > Personally, I've settled my system with use of stars, flags, etc and most > of these features are being useless on mobile devices.. Hence, I'm loosing > the ability to use MLO on mobile/tablet. > I suppose many won't agree with me and that's fine. But the need of having > more sophisticated and skillful mobile app is something that can't be > denied. > > > > W dniu wtorek, 1 maja 2012 13:53:22 UTC+2 użytkownik Stephen Said napisał: >> >> I am getting to the point where I hardly use a computer anymore. >> >> On the road, I use my Android tablet and phone. >> >> I seriously need an Android tablet version of MLO. >> >> Anyone else with me here? >> >> The Android app on a tablet doesn't cut it. >> >> Thoughts? >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Lisa ------------------------------ Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
