Greetings Dwight,

Thanks for the reply and suggestions...

[I agree with you that it would be better if the delayed archiving feature 
would be a user-selectable option. I would suggest that by default delayed 
archiving should be enabled because this prevents unpleasant surprises that 
are hard to repair. People who understand what’s happening should be able 
to select which way they want this to happen.]

Makes sense—understood… the key thing being is *it should be a 
user-selectable option*. I work for a software company myself, so I 
understand the need to modify features. Having said that, as a general 
rule, you can add features all day long—but it’s an understanding that you 
don’t take away existing features.  User-selectable would address the 
behavior and add more features without changing existing feature usage.


[Or you might be saying that you want a tab which shows a list of project 
titles. You can also easily create a view of folder titles but it will 
include extraneous folder titles like <Inbox>. In order to see just the 
former project names in a view you would need to create some condition that's 
true for all of them. For example, you could include some context on all of 
them. Or you could set some flag on all of them. Or start them all with the 
prefix :PRJ. Then you would have to create a custom view that shows all 
folder names where the folder has subtasks and the folder meets your 
specified condition. This is a little more work but I don’t think it’s too 
much.]

 

Correct-- something similar could be done with folders (or prefixes, flags, 
etc). Unfortunately a folder with certain attributes is still a folder, as 
it should be, (it contains things), while tagging an item as a Project (a 
singular outcome from many requisite action) allows me to manage my GTD 
world in my GTD application of choice in an effective way. Not only do I 
also use folders for my primary contexts (@HOME, @WORK, @ERRANDS) but each 
of these primary contexts also uses folders for its sub-folders that are 
time context sensitive (TODAY, +7, <30, >30) Each one of these is 
rightfully a folder, acting as a folder should . On the flip side, the loss 
of being able to not identify a collection of actions as a Project prevents 
me from using the software as a true GTD program in my GTD world since I 
currently use AutoFormat (‘IsProject’) for custom formatting projects so 
they stand out in the list of non-recurring actions, while being able to 
identify Status allows me to sift and sort (in a new Tab) all my Project 
Parents folders by Status and Time frame. Invaluable when wrapping up one 
project then getting a quick 30,000 foot view of what’s on the radar and 
what needs my attention. At the end of the day, anything less than being 
able to use the Project feature is a workaround waiting for a fix, and I’m 
hesitant to give up previous operations, features, and benefits that I’ve 
been using in MLO since 1.x.


Thanks Again for the assistance and understanding...!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to