SRhyse, I am happily running MLO on a Mac via Parallels (currently sitll on Parallels 8). I am on OS X Mavericks 10.9. If you mean it can't run on OS X directly, of course, true. I tried Crossover, but it was ugly (both visually and functionally). Luckily, I had an old Windows 7 Pro license already for Parallels.
-Brian On Monday, December 16, 2013 5:34:15 PM UTC-5, SRhyse wrote: > > Omnifocus isn't a bad app, but it's very rigidly locked into one way of > viewing and handling things that in my experience doesn't fully allow it to > rise beyond the level of slightly nifty list manager. It's very well > integrated and extended inside of OS X, but the number of people that take > advantage of that, or even can, are relatively few. > > What exactly are you looking to manage with either MLO or Omnifocus? > Personally, I have experience with both and by far prefer MLO for its > flexibility and more natural way of managing information. It isn't > integrated with anything on OS X, but you're presently not either, and > don't even know if you'd be in a position to be if you did make the switch > to benefit from any of that. It also doesn't run on OS X at all, despite > workarounds with Parallels and such. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/597d852d-b470-4ed4-9c14-b7fa50e96f2a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
