Thank you for this information. For my part however, There are some features I had requested on this google groups that have been released. (eg : new smart-filter ctrl+L, auto-jump to first tab if double click a task, ability to see the tasks linked to one task...) I didn't put those requests on the user voice, but here, so I think they also look at this forum, don't they ? Perhaps the uservoice shoud have tags or even #tags ?
Olivier Le vendredi 4 avril 2014 16:08:55 UTC+2, Dwight Arthur a écrit : > > Hi, Olivier. It is true that there are a number of unresolved issues with > UserVoice and the one you cite is an important one. There is nobody in > charge of consolidating requests. I for one would not want that job because > in some cases the requests are similar but have areas of difference over > which people disagree. The best suggestion is to use the comments area for > each request to ask potential voters to support one or the other of the > proposals in order to have more impact. This is not a great solution but I > have seen it work. > > > > I should mention that I have definitely seen MLO development priorities be > influenced by uservoice voting in some cases. I am pretty sure that > supportive comments to forum posts have little to no chance of affecting > developer priorities. For the record, there is another channel named JIRA > that seems even more effective but access is limited to users who have > volunteered and been accepted to the beta testing program. > > -Dwight > > > > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *robisme > (Olivier R) > *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2014 9:23 AM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:> > *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:>; [email protected] <javascript:>; > Barbara Mettler > *Subject:* Re: [MLO] Re: Same Task in Two Locations > > > > Dwight, > > Is there someone in charge of gather similar requests? > > I mean, very often, there are request that are formulated differently but > are, indeed, the same need. (It can be an old request). > > The problem is that it underestimates the number of votes. > > For this reason, I don't use the MLO voic anymore. > > Olivier > > Le vendredi 4 avril 2014 13:09:31 UTC+2, Dwight Arthur a écrit : > > Hi, Stephen. I just wanted to point out that nobody tracks how many > comments in this forum say that they are voting for some enhancement. If > you want to vote and have it count you should use > http://mlo.uservoice.com > -Dwight > Mlo betazoid on Android sgn2 > > On Apr 3, 2014, ssintay <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just wanted to add my vote for this capability to be added in the > future. > > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:38:30 AM UTC-7, Brad Konia wrote: > > I agree with the previous postings requesting logical linking > functionality within MLO. I've also used Ultra Recall and I find their > logical linking implementation to be nearly perfect, as well as extremely > simple. > > This feature would not require any changes to the hierarchical structure, > nor would it introduce any added complexity. You would simply be creating > aliases or pointers to specific branches in the hierarchy, at other > locations in the hierarchy. This would be analogous to a symbolic link > within a Linux file system, which is also hierarchical. > > Implementing this functionality would make it much easier to create task > hierarchies without having to stress over where to place each task, when it > could logically be placed in more than one location within the hierarchy. > > I realize you can get much of this functionality using contexts. The > problem is, the MLO user interface is designed primarily around the task > hierarchy, not contexts. I tried using a flat task list and organizing > everything by context and it didn't work out. The context editor allows you > to include contexts within other contexts, but there's no way to build an > inclusion hierarchy. It just allows you to enter a list if contexts that > are included within another context. Additionally, when you add a new task, > the context selector displays every context you've created in one long > list, rather than allowing you to select contexts hierarchically. If you > try to use contexts as your primary organizational strategy within MLO, > you'll end up with a big mess that will ultimately be too cumbersome to use > efficiently. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/f2dae4e0-0265-414e-9a52-abad4693bbca%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/f2dae4e0-0265-414e-9a52-abad4693bbca%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/a612a203-4d69-464d-88ed-5ade943ee614%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
