On Friday, 11 April 2014 17:26:34 UTC-3, Terry Longo wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > The approach use is to make sure the views I use to see a prioritized list > exclude tasks that have no DueDate defined. > > Terry > > On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:20:45 PM UTC-4, Christoph wrote: >> >> In principle, I really like the idea behind the "computed-score >> priority" feature. >> >> However, the way how due dates are factored into the computed score >> seems wrong to me. >> >> When I set a due date in the future (maybe next week), then the computed >> score gets a negative contribution. When the due date is set in the past >> (overdue task), then the score gets a positive contribution (and there >> is an option to boost that even more). So far, so good. >> >> However, when I set NO due date at all, then there is no contribution. >> So this means that such tasks have higher priority than tasks with a due >> date. Why should a task with no due date have higher priority than a >> task due tomorrow? When I set no due date then this means for me "I have >> no fixed date when to finish this task, it may be done any time". The >> tasks that are due tomorrow should always have higher priority. >> >> -- Christoph >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/21bc9026-363e-4122-86bd-114935963dc8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
