Hi Thomas, I'm probably not the best person to respond since I no longer use urgency/importance to sort but I'd just point out that you can attribute weighting to the Due Date in Tools>Options>Current MLO data file>To-Do ordering options. I would also say that I believe it is logical putting a Due Date back should reduce it's priority relative to No Date since a later Due Date CAN wait whereas a No Date is indeterminate. However, I can appreciate why this might not be desirable behaviour in every person's use case.
On Thursday, 6 August 2015 09:52:27 UTC+1, thomas COQUEREAU wrote: > > Hi, > I'm currently extensively testing MLO, which I like very much in many > aspects. But there is one thing that makes absolutely no sense to me. > I understand that they worked quite a lot about urgency and importance > ratings in the to do list order of appearance. > However, setting a future due date (more than one day in the future) > decreases its urgency and thus places the task at the bottom of the todo > list (AFTER tasks which have NO DUE DATES assigned.) > > Please tell me I'm missing something, as I cannot believe a software > company that has so many years of existence and surely put some work behind > this to do list feature, has not fixed such an obvious problem yet. > Or there is another reason why, that is beyond me. > > Could you please give me some hints, > > Thank you very much for your help, > Thomas > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/f73a995e-7d63-4045-b8e5-3977db63c342%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
