Mlo would provide the details of their web interface and/or API neither of 
which currently exists

On Oct 27, 2015, "John . Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Wow. Yes, IFTTT is pretty interesting. 
>
>In simple terms, you give your login details on various different
>websites 
>or "channels" (e.g. Twitter, Facebook but also your fitness smartband,
>your 
>calendar, various shops, your central heating thermostat, your smart
>Belkin 
>WeMo mains power switch, RSS news feed input/weather report [etc etc]) 
>to 
>IFTTT.com and you can define Trigger events in one place to cause
>something 
>else to happen somewhere else. (e.g. send an SMS, write an Evernote
>note, 
>turn on/off/up/down central heating, store a copy of image/article [etc
>
>etc] ). 
>
>i.e. You have a trigger event somewhere and though a flow simple logic 
>something else is caused to happen elsewhere.
>
>...Something like that?
>
>Yes, it is *extremely *cool. Putting aside the inevitable slightly
>geeky 
>feel to such a universe (not to mention distinct concerns about 
>security/personal privacy) and questions about whether a mainstream 
>audience will ever take it up en masse...
>
>...what would be involved for MLO to be able to interface with such a
>thing?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 3:39:03 PM UTC, John . Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello 
>>
>> Where is MLO evolving towards?
>>
>> I woke up in the night thinking that the ideal "task manager"
>application 
>> should be able to make "tasks" out of various things - simply by 
>> right-clicking on them from elsewhere. e.g.
>> - documents (text, msWord Docs, spreadsheets, mind maps etc)
>> - media (Images, movies, vector diagrams, flow diagrams, etc)
>> - Emails & appointment & Contacts (i.e. msOutlook type data)
>>
>> For this to work, it would be good if all of the above (including 
>> individual emails) were available as individual external files in the
>
>> operating system.  i.e. It should be possible to *associate* more or
>less 
>> any external file with a new Task. And ideally with existing tasks
>too.
>>
>> Re-thinking "tasks" from the ground up...
>>
>> In order to make something into "a task" (i.e. "a thing that I intend
>to 
>> do"), there are various things that need to be associated with a
>task. Most 
>> of these already occur within MLO. (The only exception is Area of
>Focus - 
>> which is not a field as such in MLO).
>>
>> HOW IT FITS IN
>> - Area of focus (areas of live)
>> - Major Project name(s?) (maybe use a dropdown list?)
>> - Sub-project name(s)
>>
>> WHEN TO EXECUTE IT
>> - Due date
>> - Start date
>> - contexts  (moods/mode/locations of user)
>> - goal  (time based)
>>
>> PRIORITY
>> - stars   (do today)
>> - urgency 
>> - importance 
>>
>> SEARCHABILITY
>> - text tags (as done by Evernote)
>> - Other users involved
>>
>> MARKUP (quick visual search within a screen)
>> - flags
>> - bold
>> - colours
>>
>> OTHER
>> - Dependency (other tasks that must happen first)
>> - Review date (when to see/revisit it)
>> - Recurrence data (when and how often it happens again)
>>
>> Within MLO one would then have have all manner of views and reports
>that 
>> the user can customize much like we currently have. (IMHO, the major
>thing 
>> currently missing would seem to be decent calendar showing Start Date
>and 
>> End Date for tasks, particularly if they are Goals). 
>>
>> But "fair is fair" and I think any MLO Task should be readily
>accessible 
>> by other applications.  Surely the simplest way to do this would be
>for 
>> each task should be stored in as a FILE in the O/S. Either that or
>all Task 
>> data is all stored in a standardised open source database (which in
>some 
>> ways is what an o/s "file" is in any case, no?)
>>
>> I guess what I am really saying is that I don't like the way that MLO
>and 
>> many other applications for that matter, have ring-fenced structures.
>It is 
>> stupid to have to send a copy of an email to MLO in order for it to
>be 
>> associated with an MLO Task. Surely it would be better to have a
>*single* 
>> master copy of each email - which should be editable and deletable
>globally.
>>
>> An alternative is of course to have a full-on, formal API for MLO and
>to 
>> allow other applications to see and edit all tasks. But that feels 
>> painfully clunky. After all, it's hard to imagine Wouldn't it be
>better to 
>> have "one file - one task" and no API required?
>>
>> Likewise as MLO expends, it is surely bonkers for MLO to have to
>re-invent 
>> it's own document editor in order to store text with fonts markup,
>colour, 
>> layout, URLs and ultimately embedded images/movies etc.
>>
>> And it also seems a bit bonkers for MLO to have to re-invent an
>entire 
>> Calendar way of viewing (Day, Weekly, Monthly views plus List views).
>>
>> And I don't think that just using Open Source code gets you there
>either. 
>> I think what I'm arguing for is to effectively have "Open Source
>Data" that 
>> is easy for other applications to edit and which conforms to certain
>agreed 
>> Open standards. i.e. To have "open data" / "open content" [??] that
>is open 
>> across any one user's PC / mobile device / cloud.  
>>
>> The alternative seems to be that as MLO expands the reach of it's own
>
>> universe (of data that it can us) it gets more an more bloated, with
>more 
>> an more stuff for users to learn their way around. AND worse, the
>user has 
>> duplicate copies off stuff (e.g. emails) all over the place.
>>
>> TBH, I am at the limits of my technical knowledge on this, and have
>no 
>> wish for a detailed technical discussion. I am simply arguing the
>case from *the 
>> user's *perspective.  
>>
>> To what extent do I have a point?
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- Sent with K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/2e5d09c9-4874-47a3-bdbd-bb1817a4445d%40dwightarthur.us.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to