Interesting - if fractionally tortuous. I can't imagine many users will use that. Has anybody already requested that the MLO team add the "Starred Date" to the autoformating conditions?
J On Friday, 1 April 2016 20:42:15 UTC+1, robisme (Olivier R) wrote: > > Well, > Perhaps could you try the auto-formating feature. > Unfortunatly, there is no "starred date" condition, but there is a "last > modified" you may use, in conjunction with the "starred" conditions. But it > would also involve any modification, which is perhaps not exactly what you > are seeking for. > MLO Team should add the already existing filter field "starred date" in > the list of autoformating conditions. > > Olivier > > Le vendredi 1 avril 2016 21:15:39 UTC+2, J Smith a écrit : >> >> Hi Oliver >> >> Yes, nice try... but not quite the same thing. >> >> For one thing it ends up meaning I need to create yet another View - and >> I already have too many views. >> For another the visual impact is different. >> >> I would agree though that whatever functionality is added to MLO at this >> point, it's crucial that doesn't end up getting in the way of what is >> already a very complicated feeling interface... >> >> J >> >> >> >> On Friday, 1 April 2016 18:51:39 UTC+1, robisme (Olivier R) wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> You have the possibility to group view by "starred date". Perhaps this >>> might help you achieve your purpose? >>> >>> Olivier >>> >>> >>> Le vendredi 1 avril 2016 14:08:18 UTC+2, J Smith a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> >>>> Like many of us, I suspect, at the start (or end) of every day, I like >>>> to choose what I need to focus on during the next 24 hours by giving each >>>> relevant task a Star so that it appears on the "Active Starred" view. >>>> >>>> However when I go through all my tasks, rather than losing track of >>>> what was Starred *yesterday* completely, I would find it quite useful to >>>> still be able to "yesterday's" Stars. >>>> >>>> So what I suggest is that instead of being binary on/off, that Stars >>>> are now given three possible values: On, Off and a new value "Dim". >>>> i.e. With each successive click the star appears could 'cycle' around >>>> and appears >>>> bright ==> then faded ==> then disappears >>>> ==> then bright ==> then faded ==> then disappears (etc) >>>> >>>> I suggest faded stars probably *should* still appear on the "Active >>>> Starred" view. >>>> This would allow us to go into the "Active Starred" view, select the >>>> all, and make the whole lot go faded and then just select the important >>>> Stars for today, without losing track of what was Starred yesterday. >>>> >>>> Any takers? >>>> >>>> J >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/ce506f8f-9bb3-4179-a6c7-10d29202c712%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
