Any updates to this? Merge files, sort, scan for dupes?  How about a 
confirmed EXPORT method? Run excels dup finder, and import clean? 


On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 4:09:47 PM UTC-5, Joel Azaria wrote:
>
> So, here's an update for ya:
>
> Somehow or another the entire contents of my Inbox (not Inbox folder 
> itself but everything under it including my entire speedbox structure) 
> 'got' deleted.  Pretty sure my assistant isn't daft enough to pull that 
> dumdum and you can bet your a$$ it wasnt' me.  Further insult to injury is 
> that due to the constant F9 syncing she synced past the daily backups limit 
> so can't recover from there.  I did manage to find it in a daily two days 
> back (not sure why it was two but the previous day didn't have it*) but 
> those two days held a LOT of changes and I'm finding it very difficult to 
> isolate the changes in each file.  What I need is a way to merge the files 
> and sus out duplicates.
>
> So far my direction has been to export both files to mlo xml and open them 
> in Beyond Compare.  At first glance this seems like it should be easy 
> enough but the files are don't automatically align correctly (I guess due 
> to the sheer volume of changes i.e moves/deletes) and trying to manually 
> align the start points of blocks is proving not just time consuming but 
> quite difficult as there are what appear to be duplications of lines or 
> even whole xml nodes throughout the file making figuring out the actual 
> block starts to align on a hair-pulling experience.
>
> Please please please someone tell me there's a merge tool that does this. 
>  Or at least a deduplication tool that will find exact matches... I can 
> merge both files wholesale if there's a way to sus out the thousands of 
> duplicates that will arise after.
>
> So, MLO's 1990's sync logic strikes again.  For something with so much raw 
> power and flexibility, how can there still be so many holes in it's 
> foundational basic underpinnings?  Even as they announce a $25 price tag on 
> the mobile apps (and still a license for each platform separately) to 
> accompany a $60 desktop app but yet can't assure it won't eat data nor have 
> the tools/facilities to repair such aggrievement when it happens is 
> asinine.  I (and I'm sure many others) are glad to see MLO-A v2 is out and 
> I know they are still working on it and adding features but it's been said 
> and here is more proof:  the team cannot work on just one platform at a 
> time.  MLO-A development cannot be to the detriment of the desktop or even 
> the iToy branch.   Development on all three must happen in parallel.  Now 
> that android has been refreshed to "match" the i branch they should be 
> focusing on fixing bugs and missing foundations across the entire platform 
> instead of wasting dev cycles with the cosmetic refresh they want to call 
> MLO 5.   
>
> Andrey, I hope you're listening.  Releasing MLO 5 and forcing users to pay 
> an upgrade even as 4 is still full of holes will alienate a large core of 
> your usership.  The cosmetics of 5 will not motivate anyone to upgrade and 
> frankly I think it's proven out that from mlo-a that halting dev and bug 
> fixes on a branch to favor a new major release did not garner you a lot of 
> goodwill.  I'm urging you to consider this factor heavily.  You need the 
> core users to evangelize and talk highly about MLO.  Everywhere you go on 
> the interwebz that MLO is discussed, it's rarely if ever a glowing review. 
>  It's always a tempered discussion of (I'm paraphrasing here:) "I tried it, 
> I hated it, but I went back because it's the only thing so powerful.  But 
> it's clunky and cluttered and has it's issues but if you need that power 
> you'll have to learn to deal with it."   THAT my friend is NOT glowing 
> endorsement.  That's a statement of pure compromise at best and a statement 
> of defeat and surrender at worst.  This is NOT how MLO should be discussed. 
>  This is NOT how mlo should be experienced.  This is NOT how you want to be 
> known.
>
>
> Now someone dear g-d please, tell me an easier way to merge/dedupe my .ml 
> files!!
>
>
>
> * From the sync logs I can see exactly date and time that the deletes 
> happened, but unfortunately can't tell which side initiated the deletes nor 
> how the deletes came to pass - ie was it the delete key or as a result of 
> the conflict resolution dialog - so can't tell if one of us is responsible 
> or if it was HAL that screwed up or just a glitch in The Matrix
>
> On Sunday, August 30, 2015 at 6:35:10 PM UTC-4, Joel Azaria wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dwight, Christoph.
>>
>> I ended up sharing one branch to a separate file which her machine then 
>> syncs that file as well.  With the F9 syncing it kind of has a 90's feel to 
>> it - like I'm constantly saving a wordperfect document.  It works in so far 
>> as it functions and syncs but it's more than just a *little* cumbersome, 
>> esp. for the year 2015.
>>
>> There are ways I could suggest to fix this but it seems the real way 
>> forward is for cloud sync to support syncing branches (which it presently 
>> does not.)  To be an actual solution however it also has to adopt 
>> push-based syncing (as soon as there's a change, it should be queued to 
>> push) and a more intelligent automatic record merge /conflict resolution.
>>
>> This is an area that requires some solid attention and doesn't seem to be 
>> getting any. Either MLO is an end to end system or it's just a bunch of 
>> loosely related but in-cohesive parts. 
>> Cloud sync was pitched as a solver of problems.  So far it doesn't appear 
>> to have done much of that and MLO will not truly be an end to end system 
>> until it does.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your advice guys.  Let's see how this works in practice over 
>> the next few weeks..
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/81db5f8c-0048-4a5f-b274-9324159192fa%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to