Download the 2018 manual PDF from this page <https://www.mylifeorganized.net/support.shtml>. Go to page 17, section 3.22. Follow the links from there down the rabbit hole. The best I can get out of it is that you base it on the importance of the parent, which can have its own importance if it is the child of another. So, you can have recursive importances.
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 12:25:25 AM UTC-5, Jim Peet wrote: > > I am the computed score for sorting. Since the documentation says that > the importance of a subtask is only supposed to be how important it is to > the parent task (i.e, relative importance within the task, not an absolute > measure of importance), I expected that any change in the importance of a > subtask would move the task up down relative to other subtasks. But > instead, it moves it up and down relative to other tasks,not just the other > subtasks to the same parent. This makes it some weird mix of relative and > absolute importance. Can anyone explain this? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/9e5b717c-8f85-4d96-a1e4-fc13ef02e61d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
