A. Is goal and goal master fixed, ie its treated the same way for weekly goals and monthly goals?
B.I want to implement Weekly goals, Bi weekly goals, and 12 week goals. I am considering using weekly goals, monthly goals as a bi weekly, and 12 week goals as the yearly goal. This isn't ideal because the nomenclature is wrong, but I can deal with it. Or i can make contexts. Any suggesions? On Monday, September 22, 2014 at 5:38:03 AM UTC+8 Andrei, Win&Droid MLO user wrote: > Hello Eberhard, Dwight > Thank you for your kind help ! > I want to post a link to an old uservoice request here: > > http://mlo.uservoice.com/forums/9235-general/suggestions/1114967-inheritance-on-all-goals-not-just-week-goals > Although i think that the suggestion mentioned by Dwight in the previous > post (“TaskHasGoal” and “BranchHasGoal” filters) is better. > Best regards > Andrei B > > суббота, 20 сентября 2014 г., 11:41:45 UTC+3 пользователь Eberhard написал: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> things look to me as follows ... >> >> ONLY the weekly goal seems to get inherited to sbtask, but neither >> monthly goal nor yearly goal. >> >> But it's NOT ONLY the red "!" that is inherited, but also the goal itself. >> >> I'm creating a task and a subtask and I'm marking the (parent) task as >> weekly goal. >> >> I'm getting the red "!" for both taks (parent and sub-task) but only for >> the parent task you'll find "weekly goal" in properties pane properly >> activated (not for the sub-task). >> >> However ... define a simple rule for auto-formatting (goal=week) and have >> an icon be set for all tasks that apply to that auto-formatting rule ... >> you'll get both tasks (parent and sub-task) be iconized (means to me ... >> both task are "internally marked" as weekly goals). >> >> According to me all this is not correctly implemented. >> >> (a) I do not like the fact at all, that subtasks are automatically marked >> as weekly goals once their parent is a weekly goal. >> >> (b) It's at least confusing to having sub-tasks automatically marked as >> weekly goals while the relevant button in properties pane indecates that >> gould = none. >> >> Eberhard >> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Dwight Arthur <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Andrew. >>> Are you certain? >>> >>> I created a new blank profile and added three tasks, each of which has >>> three second-level subtasks, and each of them contains three third-level >>> subtasks. I marked one second-level tasks as goal:week. The display showed >>> four tasks marked with red "!" - the second level task I had set for goal, >>> and the three third-level tasks that are subtasks of the goal task. However >>> it is not true that the three third level tasks inherited the goal from >>> their second level parent. The three third level tasks despite their red >>> "!" show in task properties as goal:none. My conclusion is that the goal >>> itself is not inherited but that the red "!" is set for tasks that have >>> a weekly goal or tasks that live in a hierarchy below a task with weekly >>> goal (with no intermediary tasks with goals other than none and week).. >>> >>> In further testing I created a new subtask under the goal task. Like the >>> three other subtasks it shows the red "!" but the task properties showed >>> goal:none. >>> >>> For the other part, I agree with you that I said it backwards. The >>> Goalmaster filter will pass only those tasks that are actually set to the >>> specified goal, with no consideration of inheritance. The Goal filter on >>> the other hand, will pass any task that has the specified goal setting, as >>> well as the entire branch of subtasks under that task, but excluding any >>> subtask that has a different goal set (other than goal:none) and excluding >>> any branch of subtasks under the excluded task. >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:35:04 PM UTC-4, Andrei wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Dwight >>>> Thank you for pointing me into the right direction. >>>> >>>> By default, the child tasks are inheriting the Goal from its parent. >>>> If we want the view to show only the Parent task, then we may use Goal >>>> Master. >>>> (filtering by Goal will return the parent + the child). >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Andrew >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/fb39bdf9-e8b8-4535-97d9-ac80cc4c25ab%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/fb39bdf9-e8b8-4535-97d9-ac80cc4c25ab%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/f58fef97-72ed-4bec-8e7a-5df4ab272a32n%40googlegroups.com.
