I second this request. Even if MLO just allowed for bi-directional syncing of projects, that would be sufficient for my needs. For instance, I can set ClearContext to add "Prj:" as the prefix for each project category, and I have MLO set to do the same. However, the project category sync is only one way, so if I create a project category in Outlook (e.g., "Prj:New Outlook Project"), it will not sync over to MLO as a project. However, if I create a project in MLO (e.g., "New MLO Project"), the category syncs to Outlook upon sync as "Prj:New MLO Project". It would be extremely useful if that worked both ways.
On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 1:38:36 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > > I use an add-in other than GTD in Outlook named Clear Context. Because it > is so tightly integrated with Outlook, it doesn't support many of the > features of MLO like sub-projects and sub-tasks but it does support project > names that are NOT stored in the Outlook categories (thank goodness for > that since category seems to become the junk holder field for most add-ins). > > Is it possible to map the custom MLO fields to specific Outlook fields > when synchronizing? In this case, I would like to map the MLO project to > the Clear Context project so that I can see the hierarchy in Outlook. It > would also allow me to create a new task in Outlook, assign it to a > project, and have it sync to MLO with the project already established. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/c13863ca-6f7a-47b9-885d-c207ddf94ba9n%40googlegroups.com.
