I should have thought of that. Nice one, A.W.! Like you say, I can't understand the point in this particular case, because you only need to assign the specific time of day contexts for an overall "time of day" filter to work. Maybe Radek's workflow involves assigning "time of day" to identify those items which will need to be assigned to a specific time of day, before he comes back and defines which time of day each one needs to be assigned to? If so, then maybe he needs to see which items he's flagged as needing a time of day, but which haven't yet been assigned to a specific time of day.
Maybe I'm over-thinking this, though! :-D On Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 07:44:45 UTC+1 A. W. wrote: > what sense that has content wise i am not sure. > however technically you can create an advanced filter - see picture. > This filter does what you want - if i understood your ask. Is basically > the translation of your sentence into a formula in MLO - advanced filter. > Of course this filter must not conflict with any other standard filter > which is active. > It becomes tricky if you want to use this logic to filter within the > hierachy, which is possible too. > MLO is quite powerfull in filtering... > [image: MLO-1.jpg] > > Radek Pilich schrieb am Sonntag, 11. Juni 2023 um 20:24:56 UTC+2: > >> Simple - let's say I have parent context "time of day" that includes >> morning, afternoon, evening contexts. >> >> I want to list tasks, that have both time of day + morning assigned while >> also excluding tasks that have morning assigned but don't have time of day >> assigned. >> >> How do I do that? >> >> On Monday, 5 June 2023 at 08:42:41 UTC+2 Stéph wrote: >> >>> Likewise, I'm struggling to understand that complex set of criteria. Are >>> you trying to find the tasks where their parent's context is missing? If >>> so, I can't find a way to do that precisely. However, you might want to >>> test from be parent's perspective by using "HasSubTasks" and "Contexts... >>> is empty" in your filter. >>> >>> On Saturday, 3 June 2023 at 14:48:24 UTC+1 A. W. wrote: >>> >>>> Hm. i think that making a step back and defining precisely what - not >>>> how - needs to be the outcome could be a reasonable next step. >>>> Currently i do not get - on the what level - what the plan to achieve >>>> is. >>>> If you want to discuss ;) - pick a time. sometimes explaining to >>>> somebody else solves the issue ;). >>>> https://calendly.com/deugister/one-on-one-with-me >>>> >>>> Radek Pilich schrieb am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2023 um 16:45:20 UTC+2: >>>> >>>>> I might be hungry or not thinking..... >>>>> >>>>> I cannot figure out how to set up filter conditions so that it >>>>> includes tasks that have both parent context and included child context >>>>> assigned AND at the same time doesn't include tasks, that have only the >>>>> included child context assigned, without having the parent context >>>>> assigned. >>>>> >>>>> No matter what I try, I always get all the tasks, I cannot exclude >>>>> those that have only the included child context. >>>>> >>>>> Please help. >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/38827688-ab2f-4a10-bade-462ac76fe00en%40googlegroups.com.
