holy shit, those 'ratz' comments about CSA are gold Em quarta-feira, 6 de abril de 2011 às 03:16:12 UTC-3, pottster escreveu:
> For me, people get too hung up trying to optimize the sorting of tasks > when in reality it's the filtering of tasks that is important. Most of the > time a "definitive" sorting of tasks is out of date and ignored the moment > it's compiled. A rough sorting is usually all that's required within a > framework of contextual filtering. There are too many subjective inputs to > achieve a rigid, all-inclusive, tightly sequenced to-do list; especially at > the corporate level you are talking about. For example, changing > priorities, personal energy levels, physical location, dependencies on > external factors outide of your control, etc etc. An algorithm is just a > tool to help YOU answer the question "what should I do next", a decision > aided by filtering out the stuff you don't need to consider right now. > That's still a good result. I don't expect automated Project Management > anytime soon ;-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/70f11e51-19ea-4fe3-b69b-417232cf9465n%40googlegroups.com.
