[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 23.02.2001 10:29:21 ?iso-8859-1?Q?T=F5nu?= Samuel wrote:
>
> > Only ¨problem¨ we know is that in our tests on ReiserFS is MySQL was 30%
> > faster on writes :/
>
> Hmm, so, I understand you right: You're saying that it's not a good idea to use
> MySQL on ReiserFS, as you may get a speed rush? *G*
Well, it can pull off socks off of feet ;)
But seriously, ReiserFS is only right choice for now. No doubt.
--
MySQL Development Team
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Tonu Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, http://www.mysql.com/
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Tallinn, Estonia
<___/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
