-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| MySql loses money from many vendors on this very point. Of which they do
| not budge.
|
| We have a Point of Sale software company who can distribute Oracle
cheaper.
| They only require a percentage of the final product price that their
product
| is packaged with. When the company explained they would rather use
MySql an
| pay them the same rates MySql refused.
I'm sure there's a good answer for this, but I must be dense.
In this scenario, why did you go to Oracle instead of PostgreSQL?
Oracle = Pay percentage of final price
PostgreSql = Free
The times I've used PostgreSql, it's seemed a good product. Am I missing
something?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCTBHmjeziQOokQnARAlPWAJ48vFaVNuIJqwJy7MeuELQNwHXN2QCcDy0m
p13BPCbmEyYZbwS1cA1U9RE=
=PKoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
