> Yes, that's what i said. He is trying to ovverride data consistency, and
read
> uncommitted is so possible. So why not use it if it solves the problem.
> else, read uncommitted sould be droped from mysql.

I don't think he is trying to override data consistency... with MS SQL,
"read past" wil simply skip the locked records and return a resultset
without
em.

With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to