Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is possible to get in a situation where you either "miss" updates
> on the slave, or your slave tries to run an update query that is
> already reflected in the table that you are copying.
>
> If the table is not updated frequently (and doesn't take long to
> copy), it probably won't be a problem for you. But with larger tables
> which are constantly changing, this can become a problem that requires
> a little more work on your part.
>
> Jeremy
Jeremy/others,
What problems does the audience see in using an rsync approach to
keeping masters and slaves in sync?
Billy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
