Obviously raid 10 would be better choice!. Recommended for safety and performance.
Thanks, Krishna Ch. Prajapati On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator < goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I do get two new Sun Fire X4170 servers with 8 SAS 300GB HDs, 24 GB RAM > each. > > Right now, we do not have a lot of data in our databases (5 small LAMP > servers), which should be consolidated. > > (The second Sun Fire X4170 will be the Webserver-Sun, the DB-Traffic > will have his own gbit switch (Webserver-Sun <-> MySQL-Sun) ) > > There are more reads than writes. > > To simplify matters, I'd like to use virtual MySQL-Servers (Master and > Slave) on the sun and use one large raid. > > Also I was thinking, to use one RAID 1 for the virtualisation-system and > the other six harddisks for the virtual servers. > > What RAID would be the better choice? 10 or 01? > > What do you think? > > > Thanks for any suggestions and best regards, > > Götz > -- > Götz Reinicke > IT-Koordinator > > Tel. +49 7141 969 420 > Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 > E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de > > Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH > Akademiehof 10 > 71638 Ludwigsburg > www.filmakademie.de > > Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 > Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. Claudia Hübner > Staatsrätin für Demographischen Wandel und für Senioren im > Staatsministerium > > Geschäftsführer: > Prof. Thomas Schadt > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=prajapat...@gmail.com > >
