it's worth a try -- the manual for 4.1 has the same text about ORDER BY in
section 14.7.

On 4/28/10 12:30 PM, "David Florella" <dflore...@legos.fr> wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks to you and everyone.
> 
> I will test the same request with the ORDER BY clause.
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> David. 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Mattia Merzi [mailto:mattia.me...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 28 avril 2010 17:54
> À : mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Objet : Re: Replication : request DELETE is not executed on slave
> 
> AFAIR you can use LIMIT with replication only if you use row-based
> replication (or mixed), that means that you must use mysql 5.1.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Mattia.
> 
> 
> 2010/4/28 Tom Worster <f...@thefsb.org>:
>> 16.3.1.9. Replication and LIMIT
>> Replication of LIMIT clauses in DELETE, UPDATE, and INSERT ... SELECT
>> statements is not guaranteed, since the order of the rows affected is not
>> defined. Such statements can be replicated correctly only if they also
>> contain an ORDER BY clause.



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org

Reply via email to